was recently suggested to me to this blog entry out, but have a change of reading. This of course I did. Now I find that, by the same colleagues in the following response Frankfurter Rundschau . It reveals once again that this seems to be a defender, in my opinion, cross dangerous attitude to their work at the criminal trial.
his client had withdrawn the confession in an interview with the expert, said Düber. From this development, he had been "self-drive," added the lawyer. (Source: fr-online )
I will not deny that it certainly can happen from time to time that the relationship between client and counsel, well, let's say it once carefully, can be tense and things happen, one of which learns the lawyer for the first through third parties.
But this should never lead to this "weakness in the defense" will be shown to the outside. This is simply not professional and will be the task of the defense lawyers simply not fair approach.
If the gap between client and counsel is in fact insurmountable, then there is only one consequence: dispensation to protect the accused, who can be requested in addition by the lawyer.
To prevent the same problems, this is my opinion for every case of criminal defense, completely independent of the specific allegation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment